Being born in the days of film, whenever I would open the development tank, and I look at a roll of film for the first time, there was an emotion happening there. When I look at a negative, it just feels different than digital.
Paolo Ciccone
You can also listen to this episode with Paolo on iTunes, Pocket Casts, Spotify, Castbox, and Google Podcasts.
Join our community to interact with this podcast guest, get access to fun photo contests, find daily inspiration, and much more!
Want to support our show? Visit our Supporter page to find out more.
Paolo Ciccone is a portrait photographer based out of South Carolina. His unique approach to portraiture is a faithful reimagination of the glamor found in old-school Hollywood. Paolo puts his clients in control as he photographs regular people and turns them into beautiful classic images. His fiery passion for film is contagious to anyone looking to explore more.
In this episode we talk about:
- How Hollywood influenced his photography
- The digital divide – From film to digital photography
- Why there is still a large place in the world for film photography
& much more!
While I may not be a film photographer myself, Paolo captured me with his passion for film for over an hour. I guess you could say that this was a timeless conversation!
Here is a preview of my conversation with Paolo.
Q: I know Hollywood was a strong influence for your photography, but I have to know, what’s your favorite movie?
Paolo Ciccone: Oooh wow, well, I cannot isolate just one, there are just so many. My wife and I watch Pulp Fiction often. Mr. Tarantino, if you’re listening, awesome job. Anyway, Pulp Fiction, Silence of the Lambs, and I love, love, love the original Star Wars Trilogy.
Q: I want to talk a little bit about the transition from film to digital photography, what are the differences in your creative process between the two?
Paolo Ciccone: This question touches on a key topic between film and digital photography, which is, the assumption that the two things are equivalent. That ‘why’ question really hides a bigger question which goes along these lines: with digital being every bit as good as film, or even better because there is no grain, and with film being so expensive and requiring days or even weeks to be visible, why would you use film? Every part of that question is false. We have grown in such a bias in our market where we don’t even question the question. We just assume that digital is as good as film, but no, digital is not nearly as good as film. The image is incomplete, it’s computed and not recorded.
Q: Okay, so we’re at the Hollywood part of your life, you’re in the industry, what’s next? Where does your journey take you?
Paolo Ciccone: Well, I worked there for about 4 years and we were doing this program where we shot a pilot for a TV show that didn’t go anywhere. I ended up sitting in the office of Direct TV trying to pitch our product. I met a lot of people, learned a ton… and then figured out it wasn’t for me. I thought to myself, I love working with people and I love working with the actors, so why not do some portraiture?
Links
Take Away
- Paolo highlights the key differences between film and digital photography, how he started to develop his career on the Hollywood scene, and why a negative will always have his heart over digital.
